Nuevo manual de estándares de páginas web sanitarias

Os adjunto información del Nuevo manual de estándares de páginas web sanitarias, e información de la página de la Agencia de Calidad de la Junta de Andalucia.

http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/agenciadecalidadsanitaria/export/sites/acsa/.content/galerias/documentos/documentos-certificacion/PaginasWeb/Manual_estandares_paginas_web_sanitarias_8_1_03.pdf

http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/agenciadecalidadsanitaria/es/certificacion/paginas-web/novedades/

Cómo citar y elaborar referencias bibliográficas

Originalmente publicado en PÍLDORAS:

Imagen2
Sencillo tutorial elaborado por la  Biblioteca de la Universidad de Sidney y adaptado y traducido al español por la Red de Bibliotecas Universitarias Españolas (REBIUN) y patrocinado por la Conferencia de Rectores de la Universidades Españolas (CRUE).

Ver original

El error en la búsqueda de la información…

Referencia:

Nunn R. Evidence-based medicine and limits to the literature search. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(5):672-8.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):672-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00951.x.

Evidence-based medicine and limits to the literature search.

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

Searching the literature, a core requirement of evidence-based medicine has been impossibly oversold. The literature search is supposed to provide evidence independent from expert opinion, which has been deemed to be low on the evidence hierarchy. Yet freedom from expertise is not free. Paradoxically, practitioners are told to search the literature to avoid authority, but because there is too much information and too little time, they are urged to rely on authoritative digests. But the chain of errors inherent in searching literature for decision making, whether in scoping the decision, finding relevant documents, or in the document content, cannot be ignored. This article explores those errors.

METHOD:

With examples from signal theory and decision theory, the literature search is analyzed in light of fundamental limits in the nature of informaiton. You can run from expertise but you cannot hide. Expertise is inevitably required to deal with these errors. So do-it-yourself searching is inadequate in the absence of expertise. The best decisions result from collaboration with subject matter experts and decision-making experts.

La importancia de un bibliotecario en las revisiones sistemáticas.

Lo cual ratifica  a << La misión del bibliotecario>> de José Ortega y Gasset, escrito en 1936.

https://emastromatteo.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/mision_bibliotecario.pdf

Rethlefsen ML, Farrel AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015; in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025

Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether librarian and information specialist authorship was associated with better reported systematic review search quality.

Study Design and Setting

Systematic reviews from high impact general internal medicine journals were reviewed for search quality characteristics and reporting quality by independent reviewers using three instruments, including a checklist of Institute of Medicine Recommended Standards for the Search Process and a scored modification of the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies instrument.

Results

The level of librarian and information specialist participation was significantly associated with search reproducibility from reported search strategies (X2=23.5, p<.0001). Librarian co-authored systematic reviews had significantly higher odds of meeting 8 of 13 analyzed search standards than those with no librarian participation and 6 more than those with mentioned librarian participation. One-way ANOVA showed that differences in total search quality scores between all three groups were statistically significant (F2,267 = 10.1233, p<.0001).

Conclusions

Problems remain with systematic review search quality and reporting. Systematic reviews with librarian or information specialist co-authors are correlated with significantly higher quality reported search strategies. To minimize bias in systematic reviews, authors and editors could encourage librarian engagement in systematic reviews including authorship as a potential way to help improve documentation of the search strategy.

Keywords

  • Librarians;
  • Publishing;
  • standards;
  • Quality Control;
  • systematic review;
  • authorship
Melissa L Rethlefsen: No financial conflict of interest. Ann M Farrell: No financial conflict of interest. Leah C Osterhaus Trzasko: No financial conflict of interest. Tara J Brigham: No financial conflict of interest.

Funding: This study had no funding.

Data sharing: Full datasets and technical appendix available from the corresponding author at mlrethlefsen@gmail.com

Herramienta MBE

Os adjunto un enlace de una herramienta para MBE, donde podeis encontar teoria y tambien ejemplos, espero que os guste.

http://www.nntonline.net/

Índice de impacto. Antonio Córdoba Barba.

Despues de leer sobre ¿Cual es el indice de Impacto?, acabo de encontrar en el blog de Mi+d, un articulo tambien interesante titulado “Indice de Impacto. Antonio Códoba barba”, os dejo el enlace.

http://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/CienciayPoesia/2015/02/24/86156

“¿Cuál es el factor de impacto?”

El efecto negativo sobre el trabajo los sistemas de salud del factor de impacto: ¿qué podemos hacer?

¿El factor de impacto tiene una influencia indebida? El profesor Jeffrey V. Lázaro explora los efectos negativos del factor de impacto en la investigación de sistemas de salud, tanto ahora como en el futuro.

Interesante articulo sobre cual es el factor de impacto.

Podeis verlo en:

http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcseriesblog/2015/02/25/the-impact-factor-ill-effects-on-health-systems-work-what-can-we-do/

Seguir

Recibe cada nueva publicación en tu buzón de correo electrónico.

Únete a otros 43 seguidores